|
|
Post by Jason Guy on Aug 31, 2010 23:26:10 GMT -5
ALL ABOARD[/size] Winning vetos and taking names. YOU CAN DO IT BRITNEY.   
|
|
|
|
Post by Eddie McGee on Sept 1, 2010 11:54:16 GMT -5
SHE CALLED ALL OUR FUCKING SEASONS TRASHY IN HER VETO SPEECH. I AM NOT MOTHERFUCKING TRASH!
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Guy on Sept 1, 2010 12:44:07 GMT -5
 WINNING VETO AND BACKDOORING ANNIE <33 |
|
|
|
Post by Natalie "NataJesus" Cunial on Sept 1, 2010 14:15:34 GMT -5
Obnoxious.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Guy on Sept 3, 2010 13:27:58 GMT -5
GO BRITNEY!
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Guy on Sept 4, 2010 13:42:44 GMT -5
YAY BRITNEY! SUCH A PRETTY FLAG.  |
|
|
|
Post by Eddie McGee on Sept 5, 2010 21:19:26 GMT -5
^^^^
Wait a minute, you made that flag didn't you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Guy on Sept 5, 2010 22:28:01 GMT -5
 Hitler says what? |
|
|
|
Post by Sarah Hrejsa on Sept 5, 2010 22:53:16 GMT -5
It WAS best flag but not if someone other than Britney made it.  |
|
|
|
Post by Eddie McGee on Sept 6, 2010 13:36:47 GMT -5
BRITNEY <3 FOR BEING THE FIRST PERSON TO NOT WISH BOTH NOMINEES LUCK IN WHAT IS CLEARLY A WIN-LOSE SITUATION.
*buys boarding pass for the train*
|
|
|
|
Post by Sarah Hrejsa on Sept 6, 2010 13:49:04 GMT -5
It's too late to give her credit for that. She already wished both ladies luck at the nomination ceremony which means she is clearly only leaving Sharon out NOW because veto wasn't used and she knows Sharon is staying on the block. If she had done that BEFORE the veto/veto ceremony you might have a point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eddie McGee on Sept 6, 2010 14:27:10 GMT -5
It's too late to give her credit for that. She already wished both ladies luck at the nomination ceremony which means she is clearly only leaving Sharon out NOW because veto wasn't used and she knows Sharon is staying on the block. If she had done that BEFORE the veto/veto ceremony you might have a point. That is true, it's not THAT ballsy at all but at the same time it at least makes some sense. You can wish both nominees good luck before the veto because one of them can get off the block so potentially WIN-WIN, but wishing both people luck after the veto is just acting like you're not personally responsible for one of them not getting "good luck." |
|
|
|
Post by SHE BEAST! on Sept 6, 2010 17:00:52 GMT -5
Hitler says what? |
|
|
|
Post by Sarah Hrejsa on Sept 6, 2010 19:21:28 GMT -5
It's too late to give her credit for that. She already wished both ladies luck at the nomination ceremony which means she is clearly only leaving Sharon out NOW because veto wasn't used and she knows Sharon is staying on the block. If she had done that BEFORE the veto/veto ceremony you might have a point. That is true, it's not THAT ballsy at all but at the same time it at least makes some sense. You can wish both nominees good luck before the veto because one of them can get off the block so potentially WIN-WIN, but wishing both people luck after the veto is just acting like you're not personally responsible for one of them not getting "good luck." Well, I just hope it reflects the majority of the house's sentiments because I wouldn't be sad at all to see Sharon leave next. Although...it was a pretty smart move to come out so strong in the first HOH and show who you are targeting right away. Surprised anyone wants Sharon out now.  |
|
|
|
Post by Sarah Hrejsa on Sept 6, 2010 19:23:33 GMT -5
LOL whoops, I may have spoken too soon (as usual). Looks like she's already yesterday's news. |
|
